LiftInAI. / AI search visibility

About · Chișinău, Moldova · working with US & UK

A product manager who learned to ship, then learned to measure

I'm Artiom Graciov, an independent AI search visibility consultant with fourteen years in product, web and technical SEO, working with B2B SaaS companies in the US and UK.

Artiom Graciov
Solo practice. No agency, no account managers, no subcontracting — you work with me from the first call to the last report.

I spent most of my career on the delivery side rather than the marketing side: project manager, then product owner, on web products, SaaS platforms and digital transformation programmes. Requirements, scope, engineering trade-offs, launch, then the unglamorous years of continuous improvement afterwards. As product owner I took a SaaS platform from a concept document to a profitable business, which is where balancing business goals against technical reality stopped being a slide and became a weekly argument.

SEO came into it because the products needed it. I ran technical and on-page work as part of shipping, not as a separate service — structured data, crawlability, Core Web Vitals, GA4 and Search Console, information architecture that survives a redesign. That background is the reason my recommendations do not stop at a PDF: I can implement them in WordPress or Next.js, or hand your engineers a spec written by someone who has been on their side of the table.

In 2025 I moved my practice to AI search visibility for one reason: the measurement was obviously broken. Tools were reporting single positions for a surface that returns a different answer every time you ask, and nobody was publishing how they got their numbers. That is a product-manager problem before it is a marketing one, and it is what I now do full time.

Book a $1,500 audit Full history on LinkedIn →

14+ yrs

in product, web and technical SEO

1 SaaS

taken from concept to a profitable business as product owner

4–6

clients at a time, so nothing is subcontracted

0

guarantees of position in AI answers — nobody can honestly give one

Where the experience comes from

Pick a period

Fourteen years, mostly in rooms where something had to actually launch. I list it in periods rather than job titles because what matters to you is which of these skills shows up in your engagement, not which company paid for me to learn it.

What I did

Technical and on-page SEO as part of shipping products: structured data, crawl and render behaviour, information architecture, Core Web Vitals, GA4 and Search Console, WordPress and Next.js implementations.

What it taught me

That most SEO problems in modern stacks are rendering and access problems wearing a content costume.

Why it matters to you

It is exactly the skill set the AI crawler layer demands, since no major AI crawler executes JavaScript and each one has its own permissions.

How I work

Four commitments, written down so you can hold me to them

These are not values-page decoration; each one has a cost to me, which is the only reason it is worth publishing. If I break one of these on your engagement, point at this page.

01

Intervals, never single numbers

Every figure I report carries a confidence interval, and if two intervals overlap the report says there is no trend. This costs me the ability to show you a flattering month, which is the point of publishing it.

02

The method is public

Prompt sampling, run counts, engine coverage and a reference prompt set are all published, so you can reproduce my work or hand it to someone else. Nothing about the protocol is proprietary.

03

I say no in writing

If your category has too little assistant-driven demand, or your site cannot be fixed without engineering capacity you do not have, you get that as a recommendation rather than an invoice.

04

No attribution theatre

There is no reliable way to trace revenue to an AI answer today, so I do not model one and call it attribution. Engagements are contracted on process and leading indicators, stated plainly up front.

Credentials, and what I don't have

The useful half of this section is the second half. Most consultant about-pages list only what flatters; since my whole argument is that you should judge people by what they can evidence, here is both columns.

What I can evidence

  • Fourteen years of delivery experience across web products, SaaS platforms and transformation programmes
  • A SaaS platform taken from concept to profitability as product owner
  • Hands-on implementation in WordPress and Next.js — I can ship the fix, not just describe it
  • A published measurement protocol with a reference prompt set anyone can rerun
  • Two research studies with methodology, sample sizes, dates and raw data attached
  • A degree in information technology from the Slavic University of Moldova

What I don't have — yet or ever

  • A wall of client logos — the practice is young and I will not borrow other people's
  • Case studies with revenue attribution, because that measurement does not reliably exist
  • Vendor certifications in AI visibility tools; none of them mean anything yet
  • An agency team behind me — beyond four to six clients I have to say no
  • A guarantee of inclusion in any AI answer, at any price

The practical details

Based in

Chișinău, Moldova · Eastern European Time, overlapping London and US East Coast

Working with

B2B SaaS, 20–200 people, selling into the US and UK

Languages

English for all client work; Russian and Romanian natively

Engagements

$1,500 audit, $750/mo monitoring, retainers from $3,000/mo, advisory at $250/hr

Stack I work in

WordPress, Next.js and React, structured data, GA4, Search Console, Cloudflare

Capacity

Four to six clients at a time, with a waiting list when it is full

Judge me on the method, not the bio.

Everything above is context. The thing worth checking is whether the measurement holds up — so read the protocol, or send me your domain and three competitors and see what comes back.

Read the method Or book a $1,500 audit →
Email
hello@liftinai.com
LinkedIn
/in/artiomgraciov
Based
Chișinău, Moldova (EET)
Reply
within one working day